CheatEye vs Cheaterbuster: Which Is Better in 2026?

# CheatEye vs Cheaterbuster: Which Is Better in 2026?

You suspect your partner is on a dating app. You've narrowed your options down to two tools: CheatEye and Cheaterbuster. Both promise to find hidden dating profiles. Both charge money for results. And neither one tells you the full truth about what you're actually getting.

Here is the direct answer: CheatEye vs Cheaterbuster is not a clear-cut choice because both tools have serious weaknesses. Cheaterbuster has a longer track record but only searches Tinder. CheatEye claims broader app coverage but has less transparency and mixed independent testing. Neither tool delivers the accuracy it advertises. This comparison breaks down 8 criteria — pricing, accuracy, app coverage, trust signals, refund policies, user reviews, ease of use, and data privacy — so you can see where each tool actually stands.

If you want to skip the comparison and search 15+ dating apps right now, CheatScanX delivers results in minutes with no subscription required.

Quick Comparison Table: CheatEye vs Cheaterbuster at a Glance

Before going deep on each criterion, here is every major difference side by side. Bookmark this table — it's the fastest way to compare.

That table gives you the high-level picture. Now here is what the data behind each number actually means for your decision.

Criterion 1: Dating App Coverage

App coverage is the single most important factor, and it's where these two tools differ the most.

Cheaterbuster: Tinder Only

Cheaterbuster searches Tinder and nothing else. This has been true since it launched as Swipebuster in 2016, and it remains true in 2026. It cannot find profiles on Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, Match, Plenty of Fish, or any other platform.

In a market with over 1,500 dating apps and 360 million global users (Business of Apps, 2025), searching one platform is a significant limitation. Our full Cheaterbuster review covers this gap in detail.

Research published in Computers in Human Behavior found that 18 to 25% of Tinder users are in committed relationships while using the app (ScienceDirect, 2019). That means infidelity on Tinder is real and measurable. But Tinder is not the only place it happens. Anyone aware that search tools like Cheaterbuster exist has reason to use a different platform instead — Bumble, Hinge, Feeld, or any of the 1,499 other options.

If your partner chose Bumble specifically because Tinder has well-known search tools, Cheaterbuster will return a clean result that means nothing.

CheatEye: Broader Claims, Less Verification

CheatEye markets multi-app coverage, including Tinder, Bumble, and Hinge. It also claims to accept phone numbers and emails as search inputs, which would be a genuine advantage over Cheaterbuster's name-and-location-only approach.

The problem: independent verification of these multi-app claims is limited. Our CheatEye review found that its primary confirmed function is Tinder search. Some third-party reviewers report that CheatEye found profiles on Bumble in addition to Tinder, but these results are inconsistent. The marketing suggests broader coverage than what most users actually experience.

If CheatEye's multi-app search works as advertised, it holds a meaningful advantage. If those claims are overstated — which the mixed testing data suggests — both tools are effectively Tinder-focused, and neither gives you complete coverage.

The Coverage Gap Both Tools Share

Neither CheatEye nor Cheaterbuster covers the full range of apps cheaters use. Both tools leave you blind to activity on most dating platforms. If you're trying to find out if your partner is on dating apps, relying on either of these tools alone means accepting that you're only checking a fraction of the places a hidden profile could exist.

A dating app search tool that scans 15+ platforms in one search closes this gap entirely. That's the core weakness of both tools in this comparison: even if one is "better," neither is comprehensive.

Criterion 2: Accuracy — Claims vs. Independent Testing

Both tools make bold accuracy claims. Both fall short.

CheatEye's Accuracy: 98% Claim, ~80% Reality

CheatEye advertises a 98% accuracy rate. No methodology, sample size, or definition of "accuracy" has been published to support this number.

Independent testing tells a different story. A detailed analysis on Vocal Media (2025) found CheatEye's real-world accuracy closer to 80%. The tester confirmed that CheatEye found some profiles that were known to exist, while missing others entirely or flagging inactive accounts as active.

An 80% hit rate means 1 in 5 searches gives you wrong or useless information. At $17.90 per report, that 20% failure rate costs real money.

Accuracy also depends heavily on input quality:

• Uncommon names in small cities: Best results
• Common names in major metro areas: Frequent false positives and irrelevant matches
• Poor-quality photos: Reduced facial matching accuracy
• Inactive or recently deleted profiles: May still appear as "matches"

Cheaterbuster's Accuracy: 97–99% Claim, ~89% Best Case

Cheaterbuster advertises 97 to 99% accuracy. AllAboutAI published the most thorough independent evaluation in 2026 and found the following:

Those numbers reveal a massive spread. With perfect inputs, Cheaterbuster performs respectably — 89% is genuinely useful. With a common name and vague location, two out of three searches fail completely.

Our analysis of does Cheaterbuster actually work goes deeper into the conditions that separate success from failure.

The Accuracy Verdict

Cheaterbuster appears slightly more accurate than CheatEye under ideal conditions (89% vs. ~80%). But both tools share the same fundamental problem: accuracy collapses with common names, large cities, or imprecise inputs. Neither tool has submitted to independent audit by a recognized research institution. Every accuracy claim in this industry is self-reported.

If the person you're searching for has a common first name and lives in a city with more than 500,000 people, neither tool will give you reliable results. That's a limitation neither marketing page mentions.

Criterion 3: Pricing and Real Cost

The sticker prices look similar. The actual spending patterns differ.

CheatEye's Pricing Model

CheatEye uses a freemium funnel:

1. Free scan — Enter name, age, location, and a photo. Wait for results.
2. "Match Found" teaser — The system tells you a potential match exists, but shows no photos, no bio, no activity data.
3. Paid report — $17.90 (displayed as discounted from $29.90) to see actual results.

The free tier exists to create emotional commitment. By the time you see "Match Found," you're anxious enough to pay. The $29.90-to-$17.90 "discount" has been running since at least mid-2024, suggesting it's a permanent price anchor, not a real promotion (Fiske AI, 2026).

CheatEye also offers a Radar subscription that auto-searches every 7 days. It starts with a 7-day free trial, then charges automatically. Post-trial charges are non-refundable. Multiple Trustpilot reviewers report difficulty canceling and unexpected recurring charges.

Cheaterbuster's Pricing Model

Cheaterbuster uses straightforward per-search pricing with no free tier:

There is no free scan. You pay before seeing any results. Some users report that initial results show blurred profile photos, and viewing full-resolution images requires an additional unlock payment — a detail the marketing does not emphasize.

Where Costs Actually Add Up

For both tools, the sticker price is rarely the final cost:

• Name variations require separate searches. "Michael," "Mike," and "Mikey" are three separate paid searches.
• Failed searches lead to parameter adjustments and retries.
• CheatEye's Radar subscription can accumulate charges if you forget to cancel.
• Cheaterbuster's profile unlocks add fees beyond the initial search cost.

Someone running two searches on each tool has already spent over $70 — and checked at most two dating platforms.

Real Cost Per Confirmed Answer

The metric that matters is cost per useful, confirmed result:

Both tools become expensive fast when conditions are not ideal. Compare that to a multi-platform tool scanning 15+ apps for a single fee — the cost-per-app-checked drops from $17-18 (one app) to roughly $1 per app.

Criterion 4: Trust and Transparency

Who is behind each tool, and how transparent are they about what they do with your data?

CheatEye's Transparency Problem

CheatEye is operated by Saasvertising LLC. The domain cheateye.ai was registered on August 30, 2023, via NameCheap, with WHOIS ownership hidden behind a privacy service based in Reykjavik, Iceland (Scamadviser, 2025).

There is no public "About" page with real names, no LinkedIn profiles for the founding team, and no physical business address beyond the privacy proxy. For a service that asks you to upload photos of real people, this lack of transparency is notable.

Scamadviser gives CheatEye a trust score of 71 out of 100 — classified as "medium to low risk." The registrar (NameCheap) is flagged as popular among less reputable sites. The SSL certificate is basic Domain Validated, the lowest level available.

None of this proves fraud. But it does mean you're sending sensitive personal data — including biometric face photos — to an entity you cannot identify.

Cheaterbuster's Track Record

Cheaterbuster has operated publicly since 2016, originally as Swipebuster. It has a known public history, has been covered by major media outlets (CNN, Vanity Fair, The Verge), and has a longer pattern of user feedback to evaluate.

That longer track record cuts both ways. More visibility means more accountability, but it also means a larger sample of complaints. Cheaterbuster's Trustpilot page has 233 reviews averaging 2.3 out of 5, with 63% being 1-star ratings — mostly driven by billing disputes and unresponsive customer support.

Cheaterbuster is more transparent about who it is. That doesn't make it more reliable, but it does make it easier to hold accountable.

The Trust Verdict

Cheaterbuster wins on transparency. It's a known entity with a public history. CheatEye's hidden ownership raises fair questions for a service handling biometric data. Neither tool publishes detailed data retention policies or explains what happens to the photos you upload.

Criterion 5: User Reviews and Satisfaction

Real customer feedback reveals patterns that marketing pages hide.

CheatEye on Trustpilot: 2.8 out of 5

CheatEye holds a 2.8 out of 5 on Trustpilot from approximately 200+ reviews. The most common complaints:

1. Inaccurate or irrelevant results — Reports containing wrong profiles or people who don't match the search criteria
2. Billing confusion — The free-to-paid funnel catches users off guard. The "Match Found!" message creates urgency to pay before understanding the limitations.
3. Radar subscription charges — Users report difficulty canceling and unexpected recurring payments
4. Poor customer support — Automated template responses, delayed replies, unresolved issues

Positive reviews typically describe finding a confirmed Tinder profile quickly and easily. The pattern: CheatEye works well when conditions are ideal, and fails badly when they're not. The gap between best-case and worst-case is wide.

Cheaterbuster on Trustpilot: 2.3 out of 5

Cheaterbuster's Trustpilot profile is more heavily skewed negative: 2.3 out of 5 with 63% of all reviews at 1 star.

The top complaints mirror CheatEye but with billing as the dominant theme:

1. Unexpected recurring charges — Users who believed they made a one-time purchase find repeated billing, especially through PayPal
2. Empty or useless results — Paying $17.99 and receiving nothing, or a wall of blurred thumbnails that cost extra to unlock
3. Unresponsive support — Refund requests and cancellation emails go unanswered for days or weeks
4. False negatives — Users who tested the tool by searching for their own confirmed Tinder profiles received no results

The 34% who left 5-star reviews describe the tool working exactly as advertised: quick, accurate, and worth the money. That polarization — almost no middle-ground reviews — suggests a tool that performs brilliantly or fails completely, with little in between.

For a deeper analysis, our breakdown of is Cheaterbuster legit examines 221 reviews with pattern analysis.

The User Review Verdict

CheatEye has a slightly better average rating (2.8 vs. 2.3), but neither score inspires confidence. A 2.8 is "below average" and a 2.3 is "poor" by Trustpilot standards. Both tools generate polarized feedback driven by the same core issue: inconsistent results combined with rigid refund policies.

Criterion 6: Refund Policies

When a $17-18 search fails, can you get your money back? In most cases, no.

CheatEye's Refund Policy

CheatEye's policy states that all purchases are non-refundable because "value is delivered as soon as the product is made available." Once you can access the report, the sale is final.

Two narrow exceptions exist:

• Technical failure that prevents you from accessing results
• Proof of false negative within 48 hours — you must prove the person has a Tinder profile that CheatEye missed

That second exception is nearly impossible to satisfy. If you already had independent proof your partner was on Tinder, you wouldn't be paying CheatEye to find them.

The Radar subscription is non-refundable after the free trial period. Post-trial charges cannot be reversed through CheatEye's support system. Users who cannot cancel through the site report having to dispute charges through their bank.

Cheaterbuster's Refund Policy

Cheaterbuster's position: all sales are final because results are delivered instantly. If a search returns no matches, Cheaterbuster offers a 24-hour credit toward another search — not a refund, but a retry.

That credit has limited value. If your first search failed because of a common name or imprecise location, running the same search with slightly different parameters often produces the same empty result.

The Refund Verdict

Both policies strongly favor the company over the customer. Cheaterbuster's 24-hour credit for empty results is marginally better than CheatEye's effectively zero refund option. If you're spending $18 on either tool, treat it as a non-recoverable cost.

Criterion 7: Ease of Use and Search Process

Both tools aim for simplicity. Their approaches differ in one key area.

CheatEye's Search Flow

1. Enter the person's first name
2. Provide their approximate age
3. Specify city or location
4. Upload a clear, front-facing photo (required for facial matching)
5. Enter your email for result delivery
6. Wait 2-5 minutes for the free scan
7. See a "Match Found" teaser (or no match)
8. Pay $17.90 to unlock the full report

The photo upload is required, not optional. This means you need a clear, front-facing image of the person you're searching for. CheatEye also claims to accept phone numbers and email addresses as alternative search inputs, though the effectiveness of these methods is not independently verified.

Cheaterbuster's Search Flow

1. Enter the person's first name
2. Provide approximate age (within ~3 years)
3. Enter a city or GPS location where they may have used Tinder
4. Optionally upload a photo for facial matching
5. Pay $17.99
6. Wait 2-5 minutes
7. Review results (profile photos, bio, last-active timestamp, distance)

The photo is optional with Cheaterbuster, which lowers the barrier to entry. You can run a search with just a name, age, and location. The trade-off: no facial matching means more reliance on name-based matching, which produces worse results with common names.

Cheaterbuster also offers an iOS app (released late 2024) with a 4.7 out of 5 rating from 216 App Store reviews. CheatEye does not have a dedicated mobile app as of February 2026.

The Ease-of-Use Verdict

Both tools are straightforward. Cheaterbuster is slightly more flexible (optional photo, iOS app available). CheatEye's required photo upload adds a step but potentially improves matching. The bigger difference is the payment model: CheatEye lets you see a teaser before paying; Cheaterbuster requires payment upfront with no preview.

Criterion 8: Data Privacy and Security

You're uploading personal photos and entering someone's identifying details into these tools. Where does that data go?

How Both Tools Access Dating App Data

Neither CheatEye nor Cheaterbuster has official API access from Tinder or any other dating platform. Tinder does not list either tool as a partner or authorized data consumer. Both tools access dating profile data through unofficial methods — likely scraping or third-party data aggregators — which violates Tinder's Terms of Service.

Tinder has implemented aggressive anti-scraping measures since 2020: protobuf encryption replacing plain JSON, CAPTCHA challenges via Arkose Labs, rate limiting, and their proprietary TAG (Tinder API Gateway) system. These defenses are getting stronger, which means both tools face declining data access over time.

This matters for two practical reasons. First, data freshness is uncertain. If either tool relies on periodic snapshots rather than real-time queries, the profiles in their system could be days or weeks old. A "match" might be a deleted profile. A recently created profile might not appear at all.

Second, both tools could lose their data access overnight if Tinder deploys a major API change. You're paying for a service that operates on uncertain, unofficial data pipelines.

What Happens to Your Uploaded Data

When you upload a photo to either tool, you're sending biometric data to a third-party service.

CheatEye does not publish a detailed data retention policy. It's unclear how long uploaded photos remain on its servers or how they're stored. Given the hidden WHOIS ownership, you cannot identify who ultimately controls that data.

Cheaterbuster has a longer public history, which provides some accountability. But it also does not publish granular details about how uploaded photos are processed, stored, or deleted after use.

Neither tool offers GDPR-style data deletion requests through a self-service portal. If you want your data removed, you're dependent on customer support — the same support teams that multiple reviewers describe as unresponsive.

The Privacy Verdict

Both tools operate in a privacy gray zone. Cheaterbuster's longer track record and public identity make it marginally more accountable. CheatEye's hidden ownership makes it harder to know where your data ultimately ends up. If privacy matters to you, consider that uploading someone's face photo to either service involves trusting an entity with biometric data and no public audit trail.

The Overall Verdict: CheatEye vs Cheaterbuster in 2026

After comparing both tools across 8 criteria, here is where each one wins, loses, and where both fall short.

Where Cheaterbuster Wins

• Slightly higher accuracy under ideal conditions (89% vs. ~80%)
• Better transparency as a publicly known entity operating since 2016
• iOS app available for mobile users
• PDF evidence reports for documentation purposes
• No freemium bait — you know you're paying before you start

Where CheatEye Wins

• Broader app coverage claims (Tinder + Bumble + Hinge, if verified)
• Higher Trustpilot score (2.8 vs. 2.3)
• Phone/email search inputs (claimed but not independently verified)
• Free scan preview before committing to payment

Where Both Tools Fall Short

• Neither searches more than a handful of apps. In a market with 1,500+ platforms, both leave massive blind spots.
• Neither meets its own accuracy claims. The gap between "98% / 97-99%" marketing and 80-89% reality is significant when you're paying per search.
• Both have rigid refund policies. If the search fails, your money is gone.
• Both rely on unofficial data access that could break at any time.
• Neither publishes clear data retention policies for uploaded photos and personal information.

The Honest Recommendation

If you must choose between only these two tools:

Pick Cheaterbuster if you're specifically concerned about Tinder, have precise search details, and value transparency about who you're giving your money to.

Pick CheatEye if you genuinely need multi-app coverage and are willing to accept the risk that the broader claims may not fully deliver.

Pick neither if you want comprehensive results. Both tools check, at most, a small fraction of the dating apps your partner could be using. A dating profile search by name across 15+ platforms gives you dramatically more coverage for a comparable price.

The best cheater finder apps of 2026 are the ones that scan broadly, not deeply into one or two platforms. If you're going to spend money, spend it on coverage that actually matches the size of the problem.

What to Do Instead of Choosing Between Two Limited Tools

If you're reading a CheatEye vs Cheaterbuster comparison, you're already past the "should I check?" stage. You want results. Here's a more effective approach than choosing between two narrow tools.

Step 1: Assess What You Actually Know

Before spending money on any tool, take stock of your evidence. There's a difference between anxiety and actionable suspicion. If you're seeing specific signs your boyfriend is on dating apps — phone behavior changes, schedule gaps, emotional withdrawal — your concerns have a basis. If it's more of a gut feeling he's cheating, consider whether a search tool will resolve or amplify your anxiety.

Research from Psychology Today (2021) found that suspected infidelity is linked to elevated anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms like insomnia. Profile search tools can create a checking loop — temporary relief followed by deeper worry when results are inconclusive. Having a plan for what you'll do with the results, before you search, reduces this risk.

Concrete indicators worth noting before you spend a dollar:

• Phone behavior: New passcode, screen always angled away, phone face-down on every surface. Our guide to hidden dating apps on a phone explains what to check on both iOS and Android.
• App Store receipts or notification previews that reference dating platforms
• A friend or acquaintance who saw a profile that matched your partner's description
• Schedule changes with weak explanations — new "gym sessions," unexplained errands, sudden work trips

If you have two or more of these, you're working from evidence, not paranoia. That distinction matters because it determines whether a search tool will bring clarity or deepen a cycle of anxious checking.

Relationship therapists consistently recommend deciding your next move before you get results. Ask yourself: if the search confirms a profile exists, will you confront your partner directly, seek couples counseling, or consult a lawyer? If the search finds nothing, will you feel reassured, or will you immediately want to search again? Answering these questions in advance prevents reactive decisions that can't be undone.

Step 2: Use a Multi-Platform Search

If the behavioral signs are there and you want digital confirmation, run a single scan that covers all major dating platforms at once. A tool that searches Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, Match, Plenty of Fish, and 10+ other apps in one search eliminates the biggest weakness of both CheatEye and Cheaterbuster: limited coverage.

CheatScanX scans 15+ dating apps in one anonymous search. No subscription, no Radar auto-renewal, no free-tier bait and switch.

Step 3: Document and Decide

If a scan finds something:

1. Screenshot everything — Profiles can be deleted at any time
2. Check the last-active date — An old, unused profile is different from one active yesterday
3. Cross-reference details — Does the bio, photo, and location match the person you know?
4. Plan your next step — Our guide on what to do if your partner is on a dating app covers confrontation, counseling, and separation scenarios

If a scan finds nothing, that means "not found on the platforms searched" — not "definitely not cheating." No tool searches every app. The goal is maximum coverage to minimize blind spots.

Step 4: Understand What Results Actually Mean

A positive result (profile found) confirms that a dating profile matching your search criteria exists on a specific platform. It does not confirm:

• That the profile is currently active (it could be dormant for months)
• That the person is actively messaging or meeting other people
• That the profile belongs to the person you searched for (false positives happen with common names)

A negative result (no profile found) confirms only that the tool did not find a match with the exact inputs you provided. It does not rule out:

• Profiles under nicknames or different spellings
• Profiles on platforms the tool doesn't cover
• Recently created profiles that haven't been indexed yet
• Profiles in a different geographic area than you searched

Both positive and negative results are data points, not verdicts. Treat them accordingly. If the results from a multi-platform scan align with the behavioral evidence you've observed, you have a more complete picture to make decisions from.

For a full breakdown of digital and behavioral methods, our guide on how to catch a cheater covers the complete toolkit.

7 Mistakes People Make When Comparing Cheater Search Tools

Before you buy either tool, avoid these errors that waste money and produce misleading results.

1. Treating One-App Results as Definitive Proof

A clean result from a Tinder-only tool means one thing: no matching profile was found on Tinder with those specific inputs. It does not clear your partner on Bumble, Hinge, or any of the 1,500+ other dating platforms. Our dating app cheating statistics show that infidelity is spread across the entire dating app ecosystem, not concentrated on one platform.

2. Choosing Based on Marketing Claims Instead of Independent Data

CheatEye claims 98% accuracy. Cheaterbuster claims 97-99%. Independent testing puts both between 80-89% under the best conditions and far lower with common names. Always check third-party reviews — Trustpilot, AllAboutAI, Vocal Media — before believing a tool's self-reported numbers.

3. Forgetting About Subscription Traps

CheatEye's Radar subscription starts with a free trial, then charges automatically. If you sign up, cancel immediately after getting your results. You'll keep trial access but won't be billed. Set a calendar reminder for day 6. Multiple users describe being unable to stop recurring charges.

4. Searching Only One Name Variation

People use nicknames, shortened names, and even fake names on dating apps — especially people who are hiding activity. "David" might register as "Dave" or "D." Each variation is a separate paid search on both tools. Factor this into your budget or choose a tool with stronger matching algorithms.

5. Confronting a Partner Based on Unverified Results

A profile match from either tool is not proof of active cheating. The profile could be old, inactive, or belong to someone with a similar name and photo. Before starting a difficult conversation, verify the match against multiple data points. If the stakes are high — marriage, children, shared finances — consider running a broader search across multiple dating sites or consulting a licensed professional.

6. Ignoring the Emotional Cost of Inconclusive Results

Data from the Institute for Family Studies shows that 20% of married men and 13% of married women report extramarital affairs (IFS, 2024). These are real numbers reflecting real behavior. But they also mean the majority of partners are faithful — and a false positive from an unreliable tool can damage a solid relationship.

The emotional weight of a "match found" notification is enormous. Before running any search, be honest with yourself about how you'll handle ambiguous results. A profile that might be your partner — or might be a stranger with the same first name — can create more anxiety than it resolves.

If you find yourself wanting to run multiple searches across both CheatEye and Cheaterbuster just to cross-reference results, that's a sign you may benefit from talking to a therapist before talking to your partner. Therapists who specialize in infidelity can help you evaluate evidence objectively and plan a constructive conversation, regardless of what you find.

7. Not Factoring In the Arms Race

Both CheatEye and Cheaterbuster depend on unofficial access to dating app data. Tinder has deployed increasingly aggressive anti-scraping defenses: encrypted API responses, CAPTCHA challenges, rate limiting, and IP blocking. Each security upgrade degrades the accuracy and reliability of third-party search tools.

A tool that found profiles reliably six months ago may fail today because Tinder pushed a security update last week. This is not a theoretical risk — it's the pattern that explains why older Cheaterbuster reviews skew more positive while recent reviews skew more negative. You're paying current prices for a tool whose effectiveness is declining over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Final Word

CheatEye vs Cheaterbuster is a choice between two imperfect tools. Cheaterbuster brings a longer track record and marginally better accuracy on Tinder. CheatEye brings broader coverage claims and a slightly better user satisfaction score. Neither tool searches enough platforms to give you confidence in the results.

The dating app market has 1,500+ platforms and 360 million users. Paying $18 to search one or two apps is like checking one drawer in a 10-room house. You might find something. You'll never know what you missed.

If you're ready to search, choose coverage. CheatScanX scans 15+ dating apps in one anonymous search — Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, and more. One scan, clear results, no subscription. That's the comparison that matters most: partial coverage vs. comprehensive coverage. The math favors breadth every time.