Does Cheaterbuster Actually Work? (We Tested It)

You typed "does Cheaterbuster actually work" because something already feels wrong. Maybe your partner has been acting distant. Maybe a friend saw something on Tinder that made your stomach drop. You need real answers, and you need to know if this $18-per-search tool is going to deliver them or just take your money.

Here is the short answer: Cheaterbuster works sometimes, but not nearly as reliably as its marketing suggests. Independent testing shows roughly 89% accuracy when you provide exact details, but that number crashes to about 34% with common names or incomplete information (AllAboutAI, 2026). It only searches Tinder. And with a 2.3 out of 5 rating on Trustpilot from 233 reviews, the user experience is a coin flip.

We spent weeks analyzing every available data point on Cheaterbuster: independent accuracy tests, 233 Trustpilot reviews, pricing structures, technical limitations, and real user complaints. This review covers exactly what Cheaterbuster does, where it fails, what it costs when searches miss, and what works better.

Need multi-platform coverage? CheatScanX scans 15+ dating apps in one anonymous search – not just Tinder.

What Cheaterbuster Is and How It Works

Cheaterbuster (originally called Swipebuster when it launched in 2016) is a paid tool that searches Tinder profiles. You enter a person's first name, approximate age, and last known location. Optionally, you can upload a photo for facial recognition matching. The system then queries Tinder's public-facing data and returns any profiles that match your criteria.

The Search Process Step by Step

Here is what happens when you run a search:

1. You provide inputs. First name, age range (within about 3 years), and a city or GPS location where the person likely used Tinder last.
2. Optional photo upload. You can add a selfie or photo of the person for AI-powered facial matching.
3. You pay. $17.99 for a single search. Payment is required before any results appear.
4. The algorithm scans. Cheaterbuster's system checks Tinder's public endpoints using the criteria you provided. This typically takes 2 to 5 minutes.
5. Results appear. If a match is found, you see the person's Tinder profile photos, bio text, distance from the search location, and last-active timestamp.

What Data Cheaterbuster Actually Accesses

This is where understanding the technical side matters. Cheaterbuster does not hack into Tinder. It does not access private messages, swipe history, or match lists. The tool queries publicly accessible Tinder endpoints – this is sometimes called OSINT (Open Source Intelligence).

The data it can pull includes:

• Profile photos visible to other Tinder users
• Bio text
• First name and age
• Distance from the searched location
• Last-active status (when the profile was last used)

It cannot show you who your partner has matched with, what messages they have sent, or whether they have a paid Tinder subscription. If someone has deleted their Tinder profile entirely, Cheaterbuster will find nothing.

The Tinder-Only Limitation

This is the single biggest constraint you need to understand before paying. Cheaterbuster searches Tinder and only Tinder. It does not scan Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, Match, Plenty of Fish, Feeld, Grindr, or any of the 1,500+ other dating platforms operating worldwide.

Why does this matter? Because people who are hiding dating app activity rarely stick to just one platform. If your partner is on Bumble but not Tinder, Cheaterbuster will return zero results – and you will assume they are clean. That false sense of security could be worse than not searching at all.

If you need coverage beyond Tinder, you should look at tools that scan multiple platforms. Our guide to finding out if your partner is on dating apps covers the full range of options.

Cheaterbuster's Accuracy: What the Data Actually Shows

Cheaterbuster's own website claims 97 to 99% accuracy. That number deserves scrutiny, because independent testing tells a different story.

We cover accuracy, pricing, and head-to-head comparisons with alternatives in our comprehensive Cheaterbuster review for 2026.

Independent Accuracy Test Results

The most thorough independent test we found came from AllAboutAI, which ran controlled searches and published the results in their 2026 review:

A separate test by Technori (2025) reached a similar conclusion: accuracy is heavily dependent on input quality. With precise details, results are decent. With anything less, you are gambling with your $18.

Why the Gap Between Claimed and Real Accuracy

Cheaterbuster's 97-99% claim likely refers to profile matching accuracy – meaning when the tool does find a profile, the match is usually correct. That is a different metric than search success rate, which measures how often the tool finds the profile you are actually looking for.

Think of it this way: if you search for someone named "John, age 28, in Chicago," Cheaterbuster might return three John profiles and correctly match them to real Tinder accounts. That is accurate matching. But if your John is not among those three results, the search failed you despite the tool being technically "accurate."

This distinction matters because it explains why some users rave about Cheaterbuster ("it found him!") while others feel scammed ("it showed nothing and I know he is on there"). Both experiences can be real.

The Common Name Problem

Names like John, Michael, Sarah, and Jennifer create a specific headache. When you search a common first name in a major city, Cheaterbuster may return dozens of potential matches. You then need to manually scroll through blurred profile thumbnails, and some users report needing to pay additional fees to unlock full-resolution photos.

On the other end, if someone uses a nickname, shortened name, or completely different first name on Tinder (which is common among people who are hiding something), the search will miss them entirely. The tool only matches against the exact name entered.

False Positives and False Negatives

Based on our analysis of user reports, Cheaterbuster produces two types of errors:

False positives (showing profiles that are not the person you searched for):

• Happen most often with common names in large cities
• Caused by multiple people sharing similar name, age, and location parameters
• Can cause unnecessary panic if you mistake a stranger's profile for your partner's

False negatives (failing to find a profile that actually exists):

• Happen when the person uses a different name, altered age, or changed location
• Occur when Tinder's anti-scraping measures block the query
• Result from recently created or infrequently used profiles that have not been indexed

Both types carry emotional weight. A false positive can send you into a spiral of accusation. A false negative can provide false reassurance. Neither outcome is harmless.

What 233 Trustpilot Reviews Reveal

Raw data from real users is more telling than any marketing copy. We analyzed every review on Cheaterbuster's Trustpilot page as of February 2026.

The Numbers at a Glance

Overall Trustpilot Score: 2.3 out of 5

This is a heavily polarized distribution. There is almost no middle ground – users either love Cheaterbuster or despise it. That pattern typically indicates a product that works well under specific conditions but fails badly outside them.

What the 5-Star Reviews Say

The satisfied 34% share common themes:

• Speed: Results appeared within minutes
• Confirmation: The tool found an active Tinder profile they were looking for
• Ease of use: Simple interface, straightforward process
• Emotional relief: Finally had the evidence they needed to confront a partner or move on

These users typically had precise information going into the search: the correct first name, accurate age, and a good sense of where the person was located.

What the 1-Star Reviews Say

The dissatisfied 63% report recurring problems:

Failed searches (most common complaint): Users paid $17.99 and received no results, even when they were confident the person was on Tinder. Some tested the tool by searching for their own profiles and still got nothing.

Billing problems: Multiple users report unexpected recurring charges, difficulty canceling, and unauthorized debits. Some describe the phone number on bank statements as leading to a dead end.

No refunds: Despite paying for unsuccessful searches, users say requests for refunds went unanswered. Cheaterbuster's public response on Trustpilot states they offer refunds through [email protected], but many reviewers claim they never received a reply.

Outdated results: Some users received profiles that appeared to be inactive or old, making it unclear whether the person was currently using Tinder or had an abandoned account from years ago.

Double paywalls: Several reviewers describe paying for the initial search, then being asked to pay again to see full-size profile photos or to unlock detailed results.

The Pattern Behind the Reviews

After reading all 233 reviews, here is the clearest pattern: Cheaterbuster delivers strong results when all conditions are perfect (precise name, correct age, accurate location, active profile). But conditions are rarely perfect when you are trying to find a partner who may be actively hiding their dating activity.

People who cheat on dating apps often use altered names, fake ages, or location spoofing. These are exactly the scenarios where Cheaterbuster's accuracy drops from 89% to below 34%.

If you want a deeper analysis of Cheaterbuster's legitimacy, our full breakdown of is Cheaterbuster legit covers 221 reviews in detail with pattern analysis and complaint categories.

The Real Cost of Using Cheaterbuster

The sticker price is $17.99 per search. But the actual cost is often higher once you factor in the ways searches can multiply.

Published Pricing

Hidden Cost Multipliers

In practice, most users do not stop at one search. Here is why:

Retries after failed searches. If your first search returns nothing, you may try again with slightly different parameters – a different age range, an adjusted location radius, or a different spelling of their name. Each retry costs another $17.99 (or less with a bundle).

Profile unlock fees. Some users report that initial results show blurred thumbnails, and you need to pay extra to see full-resolution profile photos. This is not always clear before purchasing.

Multiple-name searches. If you are not sure what name your partner uses on Tinder, you may run searches under multiple variations. "Mike" vs. "Michael" vs. "Mikey" could mean three separate paid searches.

Follow-up searches over time. People sometimes check back weekly or monthly to see if a profile has reappeared. At $17.99 per check, this adds up fast.

Cost Per Successful Result

This is the metric that matters most: what do you actually pay for a confirmed answer?

If Cheaterbuster's best-case accuracy is 89%, roughly 1 in 10 searches will fail even with perfect inputs. For users with imperfect information (which is most users), the failure rate climbs higher.

A rough calculation based on available data:

• Best case (precise inputs): 89% success rate means you pay an average of ~$20.21 per confirmed result ($17.99 / 0.89)
• Average case (decent inputs): ~75% success rate means ~$23.99 per confirmed result
• Worst case (common name, vague location): 34% success rate means ~$52.91 per confirmed result

And remember – all of this covers only Tinder. If your partner is on a different app, your cost per actual answer is infinite, because Cheaterbuster cannot find what it cannot search.

The No-Refund Problem

Cheaterbuster states that results are delivered instantly, so refunds are not typically available. This means you bear 100% of the financial risk. If the search fails, returns nothing useful, or gives you false information, you cannot get your money back.

Some users have reported success getting refunds by emailing support, but the majority of Trustpilot complaints indicate refund requests go unanswered.

Compare this to a service like CheatScanX, which scans 15+ platforms per search and offers transparent pricing. For a similar or lower per-search cost, you get coverage across Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, and dozens of other apps – meaning a single search can actually give you a comprehensive answer. Our Cheaterbuster alternative comparison breaks down the full pricing difference.

When Cheaterbuster Does Work (and When It Fails)

Not every Cheaterbuster search is a disaster. Understanding the specific conditions that lead to success or failure helps you make an informed decision.

Scenarios Where Cheaterbuster Typically Works

Your partner uses their real first name on Tinder. If "David" shows up as "David" on Tinder and has not changed it, name matching will work.

You know their age within 2-3 years. Tinder allows users to set their age, and Cheaterbuster searches within a range. If you know their real age and they have not lied about it on the app, this filter works.

You know where they have been using Tinder recently. Location is critical. Tinder shows profiles based on GPS location. If you search the correct city and your partner has been active there within the last few days, location matching improves results.

Their profile is currently active. Cheaterbuster is better at finding profiles that were recently active. Dormant or paused profiles may not appear in search results.

They have a relatively uncommon name. Searching for "Dmitri, age 31, in Portland" is far more likely to return a single accurate match than searching for "James, age 28, in New York."

Scenarios Where Cheaterbuster Typically Fails

They use a nickname or fake name. Many people use shortened names (Chris instead of Christopher), middle names, or entirely fake names on dating apps. Cheaterbuster matches against the exact name you enter.

They lied about their age on Tinder. A surprising number of people adjust their age on dating profiles. Even a 2-year discrepancy can cause a search to miss them.

They changed their Tinder location. Tinder Passport (a paid feature) lets users set their location anywhere in the world. If your partner spoofed their location to a different city, your search will not find them.

They deleted and recreated their profile recently. Freshly created profiles may not be immediately indexed by Cheaterbuster's system. If your partner cycles through accounts frequently, they may fall through the cracks.

They are on a different dating app entirely. This is the most common failure scenario. Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, Match, Feeld, and dozens of niche apps are completely invisible to Cheaterbuster. Our guide to apps cheaters use shows just how many platforms exist beyond Tinder.

Tinder's anti-scraping defenses block the query. Tinder has significantly upgraded its security since Cheaterbuster first launched. The platform now uses protobuf encryption (replacing plain JSON), CAPTCHA challenges, and rate limiting to block automated queries. These defenses can cause legitimate Cheaterbuster searches to fail intermittently.

Cheaterbuster vs. Alternatives: A Direct Comparison

If you are spending money to find a hidden dating profile, you should know what every option offers. Here is how Cheaterbuster stacks up against the main alternatives in 2026.

Comparison Table

Why Platform Coverage Matters More Than Accuracy

Consider this statistic: 18 to 25% of Tinder users are in a committed relationship while using the app (Computers in Human Behavior, 2019). That is a significant number. But Tinder is just one of hundreds of platforms.

A tool with 89% accuracy on one platform will miss every profile on every other platform. A tool with slightly lower per-platform accuracy but coverage across 15+ platforms gives you a fundamentally better chance of finding what you are looking for.

This is especially true because people who hide dating activity are often strategic about it. They might avoid the most popular app (Tinder) entirely and use a less well-known platform like Feeld, Hinge, or a location-specific app. The more platforms a tool covers, the harder it is to hide.

When Each Alternative Makes Sense

Choose Cheaterbuster if: You are certain your partner is on Tinder specifically, you have their exact first name and location, and you only need a one-time check.

Choose CheatScanX if: You want to search across multiple dating platforms at once, you want anonymous results, and you need comprehensive coverage rather than a single-app gamble.

Choose Social Catfish if: You want to search beyond dating apps into social media and public records, and you are comfortable with a monthly subscription.

Choose Spokeo if: You are doing a broader background check that includes public records, phone lookups, and social media profiles beyond just dating apps.

For a thorough comparison of every option, see our best cheater finder apps guide.

Related: how CheatEye compares in our review

The Technical Side: Why Cheaterbuster's Reliability Is Declining

Understanding why Cheaterbuster's accuracy varies helps explain the mixed reviews. The answer is largely technical, and it is getting worse over time.

Tinder's Anti-Scraping War

When Cheaterbuster launched as Swipebuster in 2016, Tinder's API (application programming interface) was relatively open. Third-party tools could query profile data without much friction.

That has changed dramatically. Tinder has implemented several layers of defense:

Protobuf encryption. Tinder switched its API responses from plain JSON (easy to read and parse) to protobuf format (binary, harder to reverse-engineer). This makes it more difficult for third-party tools to extract profile data reliably.

CAPTCHA challenges. Automated queries now trigger CAPTCHA verification, which can block or slow down search tools like Cheaterbuster. Arkose Labs provides the CAPTCHA system, and it is specifically designed to stop bot traffic.

Rate limiting. Tinder monitors for unusual patterns of data requests. When a tool like Cheaterbuster sends too many queries too quickly, the platform throttles or blocks those requests. This can cause searches to time out or return incomplete results.

Profile visibility controls. Tinder has given users more control over their profile visibility, including the ability to hide from non-matches, pause their profile, or limit who can see them. Profiles using these settings may be invisible to Cheaterbuster entirely.

What This Means for You

Each of Tinder's security upgrades makes Cheaterbuster's job harder. The tool that worked reasonably well in 2017 or 2018 is fighting against a moving target. This is a likely explanation for the trend some reviewers notice: older reviews tend to be more positive, while recent reviews skew more negative.

There is no guarantee that Cheaterbuster will be able to maintain its current level of access to Tinder's data. One significant API change from Tinder could render the tool largely non-functional overnight.

Terms of Service Implications

Scraping Tinder profiles violates Tinder's Terms of Service. While this does not directly affect your legal standing as a Cheaterbuster user (you are not scraping anything yourself), it does mean:

• Tinder actively works to block tools like Cheaterbuster
• Cheaterbuster's data access could be cut off at any time
• The tool operates in a legal gray area that creates business instability

This is not a theoretical concern. Tinder has permanently banned accounts involved in automated scraping and has pursued legal action against data scrapers in the past.

The Emotional and Psychological Cost Nobody Talks About

Most Cheaterbuster reviews focus on whether the tool technically works. Almost none address what happens to you during and after the process.

The Anxiety Cycle

Research published in Psychology Today (2021) found that suspected infidelity is associated with higher levels of distress, depression, and even physical symptoms like headaches and sleep disruption. Women are especially likely to experience physical symptoms alongside emotional distress.

Using a tool like Cheaterbuster can create a specific anxiety loop:

1. You suspect something. Anxiety builds.
2. You search. Brief relief from taking action.
3. Results are inconclusive. You found nothing, but that does not mean nothing exists. The tool only searched Tinder.
4. Doubt intensifies. You wonder if you used the wrong name, wrong age, wrong location.
5. You search again. Another $17.99. The cycle repeats.

This pattern mirrors what therapists call "checking behavior" – a compulsive response to anxiety that provides temporary relief but ultimately increases distress over time.

When No Result Is Not the Same as No Problem

If Cheaterbuster returns nothing, you might feel relieved. But here is what that result actually means:

• Your partner does not have a Tinder profile matching the search criteria you entered, OR
• Your partner has a Tinder profile but used a different name, age, or location, OR
• Tinder's anti-scraping measures blocked the search, OR
• Your partner is on a different dating app entirely, OR
• Your partner had a profile but recently deleted it

A negative result from a Tinder-only tool cannot rule out activity on Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, or any other platform. If you are in a relationship where trust has been damaged, a partial answer from one platform may not bring the closure you need.

If you are dealing with persistent anxiety about a partner's fidelity, our guide on gut feeling he is cheating addresses how to evaluate your instincts alongside evidence.

The False Reassurance Trap

A study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior (2017) found that individuals who suspected cheating in one relationship were four times more likely to report the same suspicion in their next relationship. Suspicion, once triggered, does not go away easily.

If Cheaterbuster gives you a clean result on Tinder and you accept it as proof that your partner is faithful across all platforms, you may be building your emotional security on incomplete evidence. The gap between "not on Tinder" and "not on any dating app" is enormous.

5 Mistakes People Make When Using Cheaterbuster

After reviewing hundreds of user experiences, these are the most common errors that lead to wasted money and incorrect conclusions.

1. Assuming No Result Means No Profile

This is the most dangerous mistake. A failed Cheaterbuster search means only that the tool did not find a Tinder profile matching your specific inputs. It does not confirm fidelity. Your partner could be using a different name, a different app, or Tinder's security measures could have blocked the search.

Always treat a negative result as incomplete information, not as proof.

2. Using Only Their Legal First Name

People frequently use nicknames, middle names, or abbreviated versions of their name on dating apps. If your partner goes by "Mike" socially but you search "Michael," you might miss them entirely. Consider running searches under multiple name variations – though each search costs $17.99.

3. Searching the Wrong Location

Tinder profiles are tied to GPS location. If your partner travels for work, used Tinder while visiting another city, or uses Tinder Passport to spoof their location, searching your home city may not find them. Think about where they might have been physically when using the app.

4. Trusting a Single Search as Final

One search at one moment in time captures only a snapshot. Profiles can be created, deleted, paused, and reactivated. A clean result today does not guarantee a clean result next week. If your suspicion is strong, a single Cheaterbuster search is unlikely to resolve it.

5. Ignoring Other Dating Platforms

This is worth repeating because it is the most commonly overlooked limitation. Tinder represents a fraction of the dating app market. If your partner is on Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, Match, or any other platform, Cheaterbuster will never find them.

Tools that cover multiple platforms exist for exactly this reason. A Cheaterbuster alternative that searches across 15+ apps gives you a dramatically better chance of finding hidden activity. Our guide to how to catch a cheater covers the full range of approaches beyond single-platform tools.

Is Cheaterbuster Worth $17.99? An Honest Cost-Benefit Analysis

After all the data, testing, and review analysis, here is a straightforward assessment.

When the $17.99 Might Be Worth It

• You are highly confident your partner is on Tinder specifically (not another app)
• You have their exact first name as it appears on the app
• You know their accurate age (within 2-3 years)
• You know the city or area where they last used Tinder
• You understand that a negative result is not conclusive proof of anything
• You are emotionally prepared for any outcome

If all six conditions are true, Cheaterbuster gives you a reasonable shot at finding a Tinder profile. Not guaranteed. But reasonable.

When You Should Skip Cheaterbuster

• You are not sure which dating app your partner might use
• Your partner has a common first name (John, Mike, Sarah, Jennifer, David, etc.)
• You do not know what name they use on dating apps
• You are not sure about their age or location on the profile
• You need definitive proof, not a probabilistic guess
• You want to search once and get a comprehensive answer

In these scenarios, the chance of wasting $17.99 (or more, across multiple searches) is high. Your money would be better spent on a tool with broader platform coverage.

The Value Equation

The math is clear. If you are going to pay for a search, paying less for coverage across 15+ platforms gives you better odds than paying more for a single-platform search that misses everything else.

Legal and Ethical Boundaries You Should Know

Before running any profile search, you should understand the legal and ethical context.

Is It Legal to Use Cheaterbuster?

In most jurisdictions in the United States, searching for publicly accessible information (like a Tinder profile that is visible to other Tinder users) is legal. You are not hacking an account, intercepting private communications, or accessing protected data.

That said, 84% of legal experts surveyed by AllAboutAI (2026) noted that privacy laws vary significantly by jurisdiction. Some states and countries have stricter definitions of personal data that could make certain types of profile searching legally questionable.

Key legal considerations:

• You are not violating any laws by running a Cheaterbuster search in most U.S. states
• Cheaterbuster may be violating Tinder's ToS, but that is their legal risk, not yours
• Using results as evidence in divorce or custody proceedings varies by state – consult an attorney
• International users should check local privacy laws (GDPR in the EU, for example, has strict rules about personal data processing)

The Ethics of Surveillance

Legal and ethical are not the same thing. Even if searching is legal, consider:

Communication first. If your relationship has deteriorated to the point where you are paying $18 to search someone's dating activity, a direct conversation about your concerns may be more productive – and certainly cheaper.

Proportionality. Running a single search because of specific, concrete evidence (a friend saw a profile, you found the app on their phone) is different from compulsively checking every week out of generalized anxiety.

What you will do with the information. Before searching, decide how you will handle both a positive and negative result. A plan helps prevent reactive decisions driven by emotion.

If your concerns are based on behavioral changes rather than specific evidence, our article on signs your husband is cheating on his phone may help you evaluate what you are seeing before spending money on a search tool.

What to Do Instead of (or Before) Using Cheaterbuster

If you have read this far and are still unsure whether Cheaterbuster is right for your situation, here are practical alternatives.

Free Methods That Cost Nothing

Google reverse image search. Upload a photo of your partner to Google Images. If they are using that photo on a dating profile, it may appear in results. Add "site:tinder.com" to narrow results. This is free and takes 30 seconds.

Check app installation history. On shared devices or family plans, you can check the app download history. On iPhone, go to the App Store > tap your profile > Purchased. On Android, check the Google Play Store > Manage apps > Installed. Our guide to checking if your partner is on Tinder covers this in detail.

Look for location-based clues. Tinder uses GPS. If you notice your partner's phone battery draining faster than usual (GPS-heavy apps consume more power) or see unfamiliar location history entries, those are free indicators.

Ask a trusted friend to look. If a friend is single and on Tinder, they can adjust their search preferences to your partner's age and location. This is free, though it obviously involves bringing someone else into a sensitive situation.

Paid Tools With Better Coverage

If you are going to spend money, consider where it gives you the most coverage:

CheatScanX searches 15+ platforms including Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, Match, Plenty of Fish, and more. A single search covers more ground than a dozen individual Cheaterbuster searches would, at a fraction of the cost.

Social Catfish offers broader people-search capabilities including social media and dating profiles, though at a higher monthly subscription cost ($27.48/month).

Spokeo provides public records, phone lookups, and social media searches for $14.95/month, useful if you need information beyond dating profiles.

For a full breakdown, see our comparison of free Cheaterbuster alternatives and the complete list of best cheater finder apps.

The Conversation Route

Sometimes the most effective (and most difficult) approach is direct communication. Research on relationship dynamics consistently shows that addressing concerns openly, even when uncomfortable, leads to better outcomes than covert surveillance.

If you are not ready for a direct conversation but want to understand what you are dealing with, a licensed couples therapist can provide a structured, neutral space for that discussion. This costs more than a Cheaterbuster search but addresses the actual relationship problem rather than just one symptom of it.

Our Verdict: Does Cheaterbuster Actually Work?

After analyzing independent test results, 233 Trustpilot reviews, pricing structures, technical limitations, and the competitive landscape, here is our honest assessment.

Cheaterbuster partially works. It can find active Tinder profiles when you provide precise inputs. It is a real tool that performs a real function. It is not an outright scam.

But "partially works" is a problem when you are making decisions about your relationship based on the results. An 89% accuracy rate under ideal conditions drops to 34% with common names. It searches only one of 1,500+ dating platforms. Its Trustpilot rating sits at 2.3 out of 5 with 63% one-star reviews. Its refund policy is opaque at best.

The fundamental issue is scope. Even if Cheaterbuster worked perfectly on Tinder, it would still leave 99.9% of the dating app market unsearched. A tool that is excellent at searching one app is less useful than a tool that is good at searching fifteen.

If you decide to use Cheaterbuster, go in with realistic expectations. Understand that a negative result does not mean your partner is clean. Budget for the possibility of multiple searches. And accept that Tinder is only one small piece of a much larger picture.

If you want broader coverage, faster answers, and transparent pricing, CheatScanX scans 15+ dating platforms in a single anonymous search. It is built for the reality that cheating is not limited to one app.